"Richard J. Sexton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Frankly I expect rhetoric out of [ICANN}: "renegade", "pirate", > "anarchist" and so on and so forth. Why do you care what they think? Again, why haven't you taken your case (as long as it takes) to the Internet community at large? If you have, and the result is that they do not wish to have the new TLDs that you (and others) have proposed in the root, why do you think ICANN should go ahead with this anyway? If ICANN is supposed to act in the best interests of the Internet community, and the community is not crying out for the addition of new TLDs, why should ICANN push for them? And ultimately, does ICANN really have any authority here? As the Internet community could recognize the new TLDs you advocate, regardless of ICANN, they can also easily refuse to honor them. --gregbo
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICA... Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICA... William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICA... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICA... William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICANN Gordon Cook
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICANN William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICA... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICA... William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICANN Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICA... William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICANN Greg Skinner
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICANN Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICANN Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICANN Greg Skinner
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICANN Gene Marsh
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICANN Gene Marsh
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICANN Diane Cabell
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICANN Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICANN Patrick Greenwell
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICANN Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICANN Kent Crispin
