RE: [IFWP] Latest on the Australian censorship

[R . Gaetano]

Mark,

You wrote:
> 
> One of the questions to which I didn't get an answer in Chile was what
> constitutes a quorum of interest sufficient for ICANN to accept GAC's
> advice. If
> GAC is the voice of thirty or forty governments, it is presumably not
> the voice
> of the other 160 plus. Is ICANN supposed to consult the others
> privately?
> 

The way I understand it, there is no obligation from ICANN to consult the
governments (in particular those who choose not to participate in the GAC).

Regards
Roberto