Re: [IFWP]

[Mark R Measday]

Roberto,

It is unclear to me whether you are speaking in an advisory capacity for the
governments or in a private capacity interpreting the ICANN bylaws. BTW, how
are Vienna and the reactors?

MM

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Mark,
>
> You wrote:
> >
> > One of the questions to which I didn't get an answer in Chile was what
> > constitutes a quorum of interest sufficient for ICANN to accept GAC's
> > advice. If
> > GAC is the voice of thirty or forty governments, it is presumably not
> > the voice
> > of the other 160 plus. Is ICANN supposed to consult the others
> > privately?
> >
>
> The way I understand it, there is no obligation from ICANN to consult the
> governments (in particular those who choose not to participate in the GAC).
>
> Regards
> Roberto