At 09:53 AM 10/14/99 -0700, Kent Crispin wrote:
>Jay Fenello in the news:
>
>http://www.nytimes.com/library/tech/99/10/circuits/articles/14spin.html
>
>Is it relevant that someone is paid by an entity with a major
>financial stake in the issues?
>
>Richard Sexton and Tony Rutkowski have also acknowledged being paid
>consultants of NSI. All three claim that this has nothing to do with
>what they say -- that is, that NSI supports them because of what they
>have a natural inclination to say.
The stretch between being paid to test the SRS protocol and
being a shill for anything NSI wants is just too far too
make, Kent. Besides, Dave Crocker kept telling us we "lacked
operaitonal experiece". Ok, I got paid to get some. What's
your point?
Are we supposed to believe a four billion dollar company hires
a programmer to save it's business by advance it's policy?
It is to laugh. But I'm flattered. Maybe Steve Jobs will
call me now to kill Microsoft.
Why don't you come right out and say I was a paid agent provoceteur
by NSI so I can sue you for libel? You won't, of course, insted
relaying on cowardly innuendo in hopes it will win mindshare
for your (badly) losing argyukents.
Where the consensus for the decisions ICANN has made that
has been asked for every day of the week for the past
two weeks? It's ICANN's *only deliverable* and it's gone
walkabout and whenever anybody asks about it you guys all
go deaf.
There are real issues here Kent, and there is noise. It's
left as an exercise to the reader to figure out which is
which.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"I see you've got yout fist out. Say your peace and get out. Guess
I get the gist of it, but... it's alright. Sorry that you feel that
way. The only thing there is to say is to say: ever silver lining
has a touch of grey" - JG.
