On Thu, Oct 14, 1999 at 03:04:48PM -0400, Jay Fenello wrote:
> At 12:53 PM 10/14/99 , Kent Crispin wrote:
> >Jay Fenello in the news:
> >
> >http://www.nytimes.com/library/tech/99/10/circuits/articles/14spin.html
> >
> >Is it relevant that someone is paid by an entity with a major
> >financial stake in the issues?
> 
> 
> Hi Kent,
> 
> Thanks for the publicity :-)
> 
> BTW, I'm not sure I understand your point.
> 
> I mean, doesn't Marilyn Cade get paid to
> represent AT&T, or John Patrick, to represent
> IBM?  How about Jonathan Cohen, to represent
> trademark interests for his firm?

Substantial difference: they are indeed paid to represent their
employers.  You, on the other hand, were paid to operate as an
apparently independent agent.

> Or how about all of those trade associations?
> You know, like CIX, who seems to change positions
> on a whim?  Or like Jerry Berman's group, who
> recently affiliated with the GIP, and nominated
> Rick White?
> 
> And what about people like Tamar Frankle, now a
> Berkman Fellow?  And what about the Berkman center,
> and their financial relationship with ICANN?

Eh?

> As I mentioned in the article, everyone earns a
> living somehow, and there will always be a way
> to claim that it influences their position.
> 
> This applies even to you!
> 
> Here's one from the archives:

Now that's an irrelevant treasure! -- a deconstruction of one of my
old papers by one of those individuals who has resided in my email
filters for a very long time.  Steve Page, as it turns out, is an
optometrist who sells eyeware in a Costco store down the road from
where I work.  I gave up reading his messages a long time ago,
because what he writes is always very large -- he submitted multiple
massive comments to the White Paper: in total volume I believe more
than any other single entity.

I sent an early draft of that paper to an email list something over 
a year ago, and it is now quite out of date.  A partially updated 
version can be found at 

    http://songbird.com/kent/papers/regulation.txt,

if anyone is interested in reading it in a less mangled form. 

-- 
Kent Crispin                               "Do good, and you'll be
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain

Reply via email to