Ryan
On 5/24/06, Matt Woodward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We're using cfajax right now--it works but it leaves a bit to be
desired. I haven't messed with ajaxcfc yet, but one of the big
advantages is that it doesn't require a virtual directory and has much
better debugging capabilities than cfajax. We're going to move to
something other than cfajax at some point. Given a choice between
just those two I'd go with ajaxcfc.
On 5/24/06, Dave Shuck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there anyone on the list that has familiarity with both and could perhaps
> shed some light on differences?
>
> --
> ~Dave Shuck
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> www.daveshuck.com
> www.worldwildweb.biz
> _______________________________________________
> Reply to DFWCFUG:
> [email protected]
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists1.safesecureweb.com/mailman/listinfo/list
> List Archives:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/list%40list.dfwcfug.org/
> http://www.mail-archive.com/list%40dfwcfug.org/
> DFWCFUG Sponsors:
> www.HostMySite.com
> www.teksystems.com/
>
>
>
--
Matt Woodward
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.mattwoodward.com
_______________________________________________
Reply to DFWCFUG:
[email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists1.safesecureweb.com/mailman/listinfo/list
List Archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/list%40list.dfwcfug.org/
http://www.mail-archive.com/list%40dfwcfug.org/
DFWCFUG Sponsors:
www.HostMySite.com
www.teksystems.com/
--
Ryan Everhart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________ Reply to DFWCFUG: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists1.safesecureweb.com/mailman/listinfo/list List Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/list%40list.dfwcfug.org/ http://www.mail-archive.com/list%40dfwcfug.org/ DFWCFUG Sponsors: www.HostMySite.com www.teksystems.com/
