As a allways on device it would make sense to have a highly integral self- repairing FS don't you think? Remeber pfs started in 2005 not yesteryear. A lot of decisions where made by devs (myself included) based on what was the greatest thing/best choice at the time. And over time a lot of things stay like it "allways" has untill there is a need for change. To OP; Set it to 640MB and be a happy camper.
-lsf 30. juli 2014 22:24 skrev "Paul Mather" <[email protected]> følgende: > On Jul 30, 2014, at 4:09 PM, Espen Johansen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > ZFS = FS+LVM. Its efficient in many ways. Its highly resillient to > things like silent data corruption ( disk FW bugs, power spikes). It has on > the fly checking and repair. Copy on write, snapshoting, NFSv4 native acls > and a few more nice things. I dont understand the bashing? > > > > I swear by ZFS on my regular FreeBSD systems (though I was having > trouble with it on FreeBSD/i386 latterly). I don't think there's any > "bashing" of ZFS per se, just a wondering why you'd use it on a > firewall appliance that's basically a nanobsd setup at heart... > > Cheers, > > Paul. > > > -lsf > > > > 30. juli 2014 21:44 skrev "Stefan Baur" <[email protected]> > følgende: > > Am 30.07.2014 um 16:43 schrieb Vick Khera: > > > On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Paul Mather <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >> Personally, I think ZFS on i386 has become a losing proposition as of > > >> late. I ran a ZFS-on-root FreeBSD/i386 10-STABLE system with 2 GB of > > >> RAM and it appeared to become very flaky with ZFS in its latter months > > >> (I eventually switched it out for a FreeBSD/amd64 system). > > > > > > I cannot fathom a sensible use case for using ZFS on pfSense at all. > > > > I'm not consciously using ZFS for anything on pfSense, I *think* I > > performed the default install, but it could be using ntfs or vfat for > > all that I care. ;-) So I don't know why it's trying to use that - is it > > normal for a default pfSense install or not? > > > > I just saw the warning message and was wondering what to do about it. > > > > -Stefan > > _______________________________________________ > > List mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list > > _______________________________________________ > > List mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list > > _______________________________________________ > List mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list >
_______________________________________________ List mailing list [email protected] https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
