Also remeber that pfsense has had packages like freenas (for some the
"Ultimate" all in one home device).

-lsf
30. juli 2014 22:24 skrev "Paul Mather" <[email protected]> følgende:

> On Jul 30, 2014, at 4:09 PM, Espen Johansen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > ZFS = FS+LVM. Its efficient in many ways. Its highly resillient to
> things like silent data corruption ( disk FW bugs, power spikes). It has on
> the fly checking and repair. Copy on write, snapshoting, NFSv4 native acls
> and a few more nice things. I dont understand the bashing?
> >
>
> I swear by ZFS on my regular FreeBSD systems (though I was having
> trouble with it on FreeBSD/i386 latterly).  I don't think there's any
> "bashing" of ZFS per se, just a wondering why you'd use it on a
> firewall appliance that's basically a nanobsd setup at heart...
>
> Cheers,
>
> Paul.
>
> > -lsf
> >
> > 30. juli 2014 21:44 skrev "Stefan Baur" <[email protected]>
> følgende:
> > Am 30.07.2014 um 16:43 schrieb Vick Khera:
> > > On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Paul Mather <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >> Personally, I think ZFS on i386 has become a losing proposition as of
> > >> late.  I ran a ZFS-on-root FreeBSD/i386 10-STABLE system with 2 GB of
> > >> RAM and it appeared to become very flaky with ZFS in its latter months
> > >> (I eventually switched it out for a FreeBSD/amd64 system).
> > >
> > > I cannot fathom a sensible use case for using ZFS on pfSense at all.
> >
> > I'm not consciously using ZFS for anything on pfSense, I *think* I
> > performed the default install, but it could be using ntfs or vfat for
> > all that I care. ;-) So I don't know why it's trying to use that - is it
> > normal for a default pfSense install or not?
> >
> > I just saw the warning message and was wondering what to do about it.
> >
> > -Stefan
> > _______________________________________________
> > List mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
> > _______________________________________________
> > List mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
>
> _______________________________________________
> List mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
>
_______________________________________________
List mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list

Reply via email to