Le 31 juil. 2014 à 03:04, Jim Thompson <[email protected]> a écrit :
> tl;dr: I wouldn’t run ZFS… yet. > > I didn’t see the error message, you’re barking up a tree attempting to use it > right now. > > That said, there are certain advantages to ZFS, and there are internal > experiments underway looking to use it for a future (64-bit only) release of > pfSense. > > The data integrity and resiliency (due to COW semantics & checksumming) (etc) > is one thing. I’ve had pretty good results turning on LZJB > compression and ‘copies=2”, which is nearly as good as a nanobsd image with 2 > separate slices, and, since you have a live filesystem, > has NONE of the drawbacks of the nanobsd approach. One could even > ‘checkpoint’ (snapshot) the zvol prior to any change (pkg install, config > change, etc), > and, of course "zfs send | ssh foo; zfs receive” makes it entirely trivial to > keep your entire firewall backed up, rather than (just) the config file. > > People who say, “I can’t fathom a sensible use care for using ZFS on pfSense” > or “why use it to replace nanobsd?” are (likely) stuck in a > system admin mindset/mentality(*). I get the same pushback about bhyve (“why > would you use that on a firewall?”) from people stuck in the same > headspace. I’m not going to reveal everything here, because it’s going to > be post-2.2 before any of this comes about, and I’m keeping the focus on 2.2. > > In short: ZFS is not just about building a NAS. > > Jim ZFS rocks and I don’t see any reason It won’t rock harder with the upcoming 2.2 based on FBSD 10. Multithreading + higher end hardware + more memory = potential fluid usage for ZFS. So get on the starting block and let’s see what’s going on ! ________________________________________________ «?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ BSD - BSD - BSD - BSD - BSD - BSD - BSD - BSD - ________________________________________________ «?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ PGP ID --> 0x1BA3C2FD _______________________________________________ List mailing list [email protected] https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
