are you saying that people with dynamic IP shouldn't use pfSense behind an Asterisk service? I've had asterisk running behind Fritz-Box for years without any trouble. I've seen the cheapest router being able to handle this like the speedports. I can't believe pfSense is unable to do this, but it doesn't matter a clear word would solve the problem for all the time and you do not have to worry again about this issue.
maybe you guys do better telling those users to change there router? On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Chris Bagnall <[email protected]> wrote: > On 26/9/14 12:06 pm, Giles Coochey wrote: >> >> I can think of many reasons, why running a service such as Asterisk, on >> an IP address that you have a temporary lease for (thus only have a >> passing relationship with, before it is passed to someone else), would >> be pretty bad practice. > > > I think Giles has put it far better than I did :-) > > In short, Asterisk is temperamental with dynamic IPs _in general_, it's not > necessarily specific to pfSense (though I appreciate this bug report relates > specifically to pfSense). > > I've seen the same symptoms with Asterisk servers behind Draytek routers, > for example - as with pfSense, it's usually solved with a state table reset. > > > Kind regards, > > Chris > -- > This email is made from 100% recycled electrons > _______________________________________________ > List mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list _______________________________________________ List mailing list [email protected] https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
