I would like to repeat Vassilis questions:

Has this been implemented? Could this be implemented? Do the pfsense
dev's need some more info? Can we help with testing?

On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Vassilis V. <[email protected]> wrote:
> ADSL over PPPoE with constant changing IPs is the standard in some
> countries, we do not have such connections because we chose them and we
> like the challenge..
>
> Reading again the whole bug report, there seems to be alot of people
> affected by this and Tom De Coninck has made alot of effort to figure
> out what might be the issue.
>
> In the last post of Tom, he comes to a very exact conclusion:
> "I think this proves that pfsense not only needs to kill states on 'WAN
> DOWN' , but also on 'WAN UP'. I can't see how it could work otherwise"
>
> Has this been implemented? Could this be implemented? Do the pfsense
> dev's need some more info? Can we help with testing?
>
> Vassilis
>
>
> Hannes Werner wrote on 26.09.2014 22:53:
>> Thanks Vassilis,
>>
>> I've these settings already - without any success.
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 9:03 PM, Vassilis V. <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hannes Werner wrote on 26.09.2014 16:51:
>>>> thank you very much Giles, but unfortunately it doesn't help.
>>>>
>>>> anyone here who is using asterisk behind pfSense on a dynamic IP WAN
>>>> successfully?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hello Hannes!
>>>
>>> I have also used asterisk behind a dynamic PPPoE WAN. I had the exact
>>> same issues that the bug report is describing.
>>>
>>> I tried different ways to get it to work and I found that some solutions
>>> work with some providers, but fail at others. There seems to be alot of
>>> black magic involved when configuring SIP to work in such a configuration :)
>>>
>>> What worked best was to set nat=no and externip=<the local asterisk IP>.
>>> I had also not done any port forwards whatsoever on pfsense,  outgoing
>>> NAT was set to automatic.
>>>
>>> I certainly cannot explain why it was working that way!
>>>
>>>
>>> Hope it helps!
>>> Vassilis
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> List mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
>> _______________________________________________
>> List mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
>>
> _______________________________________________
> List mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
_______________________________________________
List mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list

Reply via email to