This list is not about Ubiquiti. (At least not until we make pfSense available on Ubiquiti platforms.)
Please take the discussion elsewhere. jim > On Oct 24, 2014, at 12:38 PM, Josh Reynolds <j...@spitwspots.com> wrote: > > I am the CIO of a WISP who uses their products, and does a lot of alpha/beta > testing for them and other vendors... I may be a little biased. > > The M series gear is pretty good kit for point to point or point to multi > point applications. AirFiber is great for ~10 mile or less shots, with > bandwidth a little over 765Mbps full duplex on short range shots with the > AF24. The new UniFi products are looking good, basically local or remote > "cloud" managed routers, switches, access points, and phones, with plans to > fold the unifi-video line directly in, as well as the mFi sensor line into > the same interface. The camera hardware is getting better, but the native > camera feature set needs work... I can't seem to get it pounded into peoples > heads that RTSP and cookieless jpg snapshots should be native on the cameras > themselves. > > 1M pps routing for $99 on an edgerouter-lite ain't a bad gig. I'd still like > to see more work done on the HA front - I need more than VRRP. The QoS engine > and firewall engines could both stand to be rebuilt, and might be in the > fairly near future. The standard 8 port edgerouter and edgerouter pro models > are pretty nice. I'm excited to see how the "carrier" and other future models > turn out. > > There -- that's a quick writeup that should be useful for people on this list. > > > > > > > > Did Thompson molt yet? > Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer > SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com <http://www.spitwspots.com/>On 10/24/2014 > 05:53 AM, Ryan Coleman wrote: >> I presume UBNT is Ubiquiti? >> >> I'm probably going to start testing their hardware for other applications (I >> work in the video surveillance industry as well as high capacity wifi) and >> I'd be curious to get some pros/cons from those who know... so please email >> me off list (so as not to offend the other Thompson on the list... he might >> molt on me anyway). >> >> Sliante! >> >> >> On 10/24/2014 4:03 AM, Adam Thompson wrote: >>> [One public correction, nothing to do with Godwin's law! -Adam] >>> >>> On 14-10-23 08:36 PM, Jim Thompson wrote: >>>>> Not that UBNT is a paragon of openness, either, >>>> “either”? Wow. Strike 2. >>> That wasn't a dig at you or ESF or NG - I was thinking of Brocade when I >>> wrote that. I could also use UBNT's competitor, MikroTik, as a good >>> example of how to build decent products the wrong way, but Brocade was my >>> target here. You're a paragon of open-source stewardship in comparison! >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> List mailing list >> List@lists.pfsense.org <mailto:List@lists.pfsense.org> >> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list >> <https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list> > > _______________________________________________ > List mailing list > List@lists.pfsense.org > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
_______________________________________________ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
