I did ask the reply to be off-list…
> On Oct 24, 2014, at 17:57, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote: > > "You said it, man. Nobody fucks with the Jesus." > Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer > SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com <http://www.spitwspots.com/>On 10/24/2014 > 02:54 PM, Jim Thompson wrote: >> Josh, >> >> >> First, did you not read the part where I said, "(At least not until we make >> pfSense available on Ubiquiti platforms.)” ?? >> >> Note that I’ve *always* said that pfSense software on the ERL will occur >> *after* (emphasis: **AFTER**) the regular 2.2 release. >> >> WAIT, BACK UP. DID YOU READ THE AFTER PART? I just want to be clear. >> >> A-F-T-E-R >> >> Now, since you asked, >> >> There is currently an upstream problem with the (MIPS) toolchain. Once we >> have that sorted, the effort will resume. We’re also in a (much) deeper >> relationship with Cavium now, so there is a possibility that we can put some >> of the acceleration bits in with time. >> >> Frankly, there is an internal build of pfSense software for the Beaglebone >> Black, too. Not that we’re planning on selling BBB (though Netgate >> will be selling same) with pfSense software pre-loaded, but it does allow us >> to work out the kinks in the process to support architectures other >> than i386 and amd64. >> >> But this is all still very back-burner compared to the effort to get pfSense >> 2.2 to a RELEASEd status. >> >> The lizard has spoken. >> >> Jim >> >>> On Oct 24, 2014, at 5:37 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> Shouldn't the EdgeRouter lite support pfsense with the 2.2 release? >>> >>> Your own post: >>> "When what I'm trying to do is make pfSense available on an inexpensive >>> platform. It should perform better than an Alix, even without the >>> private-SDK stunts. >>> >>> Jim" >>> >>> from: http://lists.pfsense.org/pipermail/dev/2013-November/000448.html >>> <http://lists.pfsense.org/pipermail/dev/2013-November/000448.html> >>> Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer >>> SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com <http://www.spitwspots.com/>On 10/24/2014 >>> 10:14 AM, Jim Thompson wrote: >>>> >>>> This list is not about Ubiquiti. (At least not until we make pfSense >>>> available on Ubiquiti platforms.) >>>> >>>> Please take the discussion elsewhere. >>>> >>>> jim >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Oct 24, 2014, at 12:38 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected] >>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I am the CIO of a WISP who uses their products, and does a lot of >>>>> alpha/beta testing for them and other vendors... I may be a little biased. >>>>> >>>>> The M series gear is pretty good kit for point to point or point to multi >>>>> point applications. AirFiber is great for ~10 mile or less shots, with >>>>> bandwidth a little over 765Mbps full duplex on short range shots with the >>>>> AF24. The new UniFi products are looking good, basically local or remote >>>>> "cloud" managed routers, switches, access points, and phones, with plans >>>>> to fold the unifi-video line directly in, as well as the mFi sensor line >>>>> into the same interface. The camera hardware is getting better, but the >>>>> native camera feature set needs work... I can't seem to get it pounded >>>>> into peoples heads that RTSP and cookieless jpg snapshots should be >>>>> native on the cameras themselves. >>>>> >>>>> 1M pps routing for $99 on an edgerouter-lite ain't a bad gig. I'd still >>>>> like to see more work done on the HA front - I need more than VRRP. The >>>>> QoS engine and firewall engines could both stand to be rebuilt, and might >>>>> be in the fairly near future. The standard 8 port edgerouter and >>>>> edgerouter pro models are pretty nice. I'm excited to see how the >>>>> "carrier" and other future models turn out. >>>>> >>>>> There -- that's a quick writeup that should be useful for people on this >>>>> list. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Did Thompson molt yet? >>>>> Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer >>>>> SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com <http://www.spitwspots.com/>On 10/24/2014 >>>>> 05:53 AM, Ryan Coleman wrote: >>>>>> I presume UBNT is Ubiquiti? >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm probably going to start testing their hardware for other >>>>>> applications (I work in the video surveillance industry as well as high >>>>>> capacity wifi) and I'd be curious to get some pros/cons from those who >>>>>> know... so please email me off list (so as not to offend the other >>>>>> Thompson on the list... he might molt on me anyway). >>>>>> >>>>>> Sliante! >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 10/24/2014 4:03 AM, Adam Thompson wrote: >>>>>>> [One public correction, nothing to do with Godwin's law! -Adam] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 14-10-23 08:36 PM, Jim Thompson wrote: >>>>>>>>> Not that UBNT is a paragon of openness, either, >>>>>>>> “either”? Wow. Strike 2. >>>>>>> That wasn't a dig at you or ESF or NG - I was thinking of Brocade when >>>>>>> I wrote that. I could also use UBNT's competitor, MikroTik, as a good >>>>>>> example of how to build decent products the wrong way, but Brocade was >>>>>>> my target here. You're a paragon of open-source stewardship in >>>>>>> comparison! >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> List mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>>>>> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list >>>>>> <https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> List mailing list >>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>>>> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list >>>>> <https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> List mailing list >>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>>> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list >>>> <https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> List mailing list >>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list >>> <https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> List mailing list >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list >> <https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list> > _______________________________________________ > List mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
_______________________________________________ List mailing list [email protected] https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
