Josh,
First, did you not read the part where I said, "(At least not until we make pfSense available on Ubiquiti platforms.)” ?? Note that I’ve *always* said that pfSense software on the ERL will occur *after* (emphasis: **AFTER**) the regular 2.2 release. WAIT, BACK UP. DID YOU READ THE AFTER PART? I just want to be clear. A-F-T-E-R Now, since you asked, There is currently an upstream problem with the (MIPS) toolchain. Once we have that sorted, the effort will resume. We’re also in a (much) deeper relationship with Cavium now, so there is a possibility that we can put some of the acceleration bits in with time. Frankly, there is an internal build of pfSense software for the Beaglebone Black, too. Not that we’re planning on selling BBB (though Netgate will be selling same) with pfSense software pre-loaded, but it does allow us to work out the kinks in the process to support architectures other than i386 and amd64. But this is all still very back-burner compared to the effort to get pfSense 2.2 to a RELEASEd status. The lizard has spoken. Jim > On Oct 24, 2014, at 5:37 PM, Josh Reynolds <j...@spitwspots.com> wrote: > > Shouldn't the EdgeRouter lite support pfsense with the 2.2 release? > > Your own post: > "When what I'm trying to do is make pfSense available on an inexpensive > platform. It should perform better than an Alix, even without the > private-SDK stunts. > > Jim" > > from: http://lists.pfsense.org/pipermail/dev/2013-November/000448.html > <http://lists.pfsense.org/pipermail/dev/2013-November/000448.html> > Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer > SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com <http://www.spitwspots.com/>On 10/24/2014 > 10:14 AM, Jim Thompson wrote: >> >> This list is not about Ubiquiti. (At least not until we make pfSense >> available on Ubiquiti platforms.) >> >> Please take the discussion elsewhere. >> >> jim >> >> >>> On Oct 24, 2014, at 12:38 PM, Josh Reynolds <j...@spitwspots.com >>> <mailto:j...@spitwspots.com>> wrote: >>> >>> I am the CIO of a WISP who uses their products, and does a lot of >>> alpha/beta testing for them and other vendors... I may be a little biased. >>> >>> The M series gear is pretty good kit for point to point or point to multi >>> point applications. AirFiber is great for ~10 mile or less shots, with >>> bandwidth a little over 765Mbps full duplex on short range shots with the >>> AF24. The new UniFi products are looking good, basically local or remote >>> "cloud" managed routers, switches, access points, and phones, with plans to >>> fold the unifi-video line directly in, as well as the mFi sensor line into >>> the same interface. The camera hardware is getting better, but the native >>> camera feature set needs work... I can't seem to get it pounded into >>> peoples heads that RTSP and cookieless jpg snapshots should be native on >>> the cameras themselves. >>> >>> 1M pps routing for $99 on an edgerouter-lite ain't a bad gig. I'd still >>> like to see more work done on the HA front - I need more than VRRP. The QoS >>> engine and firewall engines could both stand to be rebuilt, and might be in >>> the fairly near future. The standard 8 port edgerouter and edgerouter pro >>> models are pretty nice. I'm excited to see how the "carrier" and other >>> future models turn out. >>> >>> There -- that's a quick writeup that should be useful for people on this >>> list. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Did Thompson molt yet? >>> Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer >>> SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com <http://www.spitwspots.com/>On 10/24/2014 >>> 05:53 AM, Ryan Coleman wrote: >>>> I presume UBNT is Ubiquiti? >>>> >>>> I'm probably going to start testing their hardware for other applications >>>> (I work in the video surveillance industry as well as high capacity wifi) >>>> and I'd be curious to get some pros/cons from those who know... so please >>>> email me off list (so as not to offend the other Thompson on the list... >>>> he might molt on me anyway). >>>> >>>> Sliante! >>>> >>>> >>>> On 10/24/2014 4:03 AM, Adam Thompson wrote: >>>>> [One public correction, nothing to do with Godwin's law! -Adam] >>>>> >>>>> On 14-10-23 08:36 PM, Jim Thompson wrote: >>>>>>> Not that UBNT is a paragon of openness, either, >>>>>> “either”? Wow. Strike 2. >>>>> That wasn't a dig at you or ESF or NG - I was thinking of Brocade when I >>>>> wrote that. I could also use UBNT's competitor, MikroTik, as a good >>>>> example of how to build decent products the wrong way, but Brocade was my >>>>> target here. You're a paragon of open-source stewardship in comparison! >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> List mailing list >>>> List@lists.pfsense.org <mailto:List@lists.pfsense.org> >>>> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list >>>> <https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> List mailing list >>> List@lists.pfsense.org <mailto:List@lists.pfsense.org> >>> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list >>> <https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> List mailing list >> List@lists.pfsense.org <mailto:List@lists.pfsense.org> >> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list >> <https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list> > _______________________________________________ > List mailing list > List@lists.pfsense.org > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
_______________________________________________ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
