It's not your "fault", it's "my fault". I made an apparently poor
assumption that the info might be useful to people on this list in a
small-blurb format. Useful or not, it caused extra background noise.
I'd perfer to let this /offtopic end, if you will.
Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer
SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com <http://www.spitwspots.com>
On 10/24/2014 03:07 PM, Ryan Coleman wrote:
I did ask the reply to be off-list…
On Oct 24, 2014, at 17:57, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
"You said it, man. Nobody fucks with the Jesus."
Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer
SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com <http://www.spitwspots.com/>
On 10/24/2014 02:54 PM, Jim Thompson wrote:
Josh,
First, did you not read the part where I said, "(At least not until
we make pfSense available on Ubiquiti platforms.)” ??
Note that I’ve *always* said that pfSense software on the ERL will
occur *after* (emphasis: **AFTER**) the regular 2.2 release.
WAIT, BACK UP. DID YOU READ THE */_AFTER_/* PART? I just want to be
clear.
A-F-T-E-R
Now, since you asked,
There is currently an upstream problem with the (MIPS) toolchain.
Once we have that sorted, the effort will resume. We’re also in a
(much) deeper
relationship with Cavium now, so there is a possibility that we can
put some of the acceleration bits in with time.
Frankly, there is an internal build of pfSense software for the
Beaglebone Black, too. Not that we’re planning on selling BBB
(though Netgate
will be selling same) with pfSense software pre-loaded, but it does
allow us to work out the kinks in the process to support
architectures other
than i386 and amd64.
But this is all still very back-burner compared to the effort to get
pfSense 2.2 to a RELEASEd status.
The lizard has spoken.
Jim
On Oct 24, 2014, at 5:37 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Shouldn't the EdgeRouter lite support pfsense with the 2.2 release?
Your own post:
"When what I'm trying to do is make pfSense available on an inexpensive
platform. It should perform better than an Alix, even without the
private-SDK stunts.
Jim"
from: http://lists.pfsense.org/pipermail/dev/2013-November/000448.html
Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer
SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com <http://www.spitwspots.com/>
On 10/24/2014 10:14 AM, Jim Thompson wrote:
This list is not about Ubiquiti. (At least not until we make
pfSense available on Ubiquiti platforms.)
Please take the discussion elsewhere.
jim
On Oct 24, 2014, at 12:38 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I am the CIO of a WISP who uses their products, and does a lot of
alpha/beta testing for them and other vendors... I may be a
little biased.
The M series gear is pretty good kit for point to point or point
to multi point applications. AirFiber is great for ~10 mile or
less shots, with bandwidth a little over 765Mbps full duplex on
short range shots with the AF24. The new UniFi products are
looking good, basically localor remote "cloud" managed routers,
switches, access points, and phones, with plans to fold the
unifi-video line directly in, as well as the mFi sensor line into
the same interface. The camera hardware is getting better, but
the native camera feature set needs work... I can't seem to get
it pounded into peoples heads that RTSP and cookieless jpg
snapshots should be native on the cameras themselves.
1M pps routing for $99 on an edgerouter-lite ain't a bad gig. I'd
still like to see more work done on the HA front- I need more
than VRRP. The QoS engine and firewall engines could both stand
to be rebuilt, and might be in the fairly near future. The
standard 8 port edgerouter and edgerouter pro models are pretty
nice. I'm excited to see how the "carrier" and other future
models turn out.
There-- that's a quick writeup that should be useful for people
on this list.
Did Thompson molt yet?
Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer
SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com <http://www.spitwspots.com/>
On 10/24/2014 05:53 AM, Ryan Coleman wrote:
I presume UBNT is Ubiquiti?
I'm probably going to start testing their hardware for other
applications (I work in the video surveillance industry as well
as high capacity wifi) and I'd be curious to get some pros/cons
from those who know... so please email me off list (so as not to
offend the other Thompson on the list... he might molt on me
anyway).
Sliante!
On 10/24/2014 4:03 AM, Adam Thompson wrote:
[One public correction, nothing to do with Godwin's law! -Adam]
On 14-10-23 08:36 PM, Jim Thompson wrote:
Not that UBNT is a paragon of openness, either,
“either”? Wow. Strike 2.
That wasn't a dig at you or ESF or NG - I was thinking of
Brocade when I wrote that. I could also use UBNT's competitor,
MikroTik, as a good example of how to build decent products the
wrong way, but Brocade was my target here. You're a paragon of
open-source stewardship in comparison!
_______________________________________________
List mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
_______________________________________________
List mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
_______________________________________________
List mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
_______________________________________________
List mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
_______________________________________________
List mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
_______________________________________________
List mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
_______________________________________________
List mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
_______________________________________________
List mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
