It should autotune by default based on memory iirc. On Wed, Jan 25, 2017, 23:27 Peder Rovelstad <provels...@comcast.net> wrote:
> FWiW - My nano (4 NICs, 1GB, Community), PuTTY says: > > kern.ipc.nmbufs: 131925 > kern.ipc.nmbclusters: 20612 > > but nothing explicitly set on the tunables page, just whatever's built in. > > -----Original Message----- > From: List [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf Of Karl Fife > Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 4:02 PM > To: pfSense Support and Discussion Mailing List <list@lists.pfsense.org> > Subject: Re: [pfSense] Intel Atom C2758 (Rangeley/Avoton) install/boot > failure with pfSense 2.3.2 > > This is a good theory, because RRD data from 2.2.6 suggests that the > difference in utilization between the versions is slight, and that we had > 'barely' exhausted our system default allocation. > > Is there a difference between nano and full with respect to the installer > explicitly setting tunables for kern.ipc.nmbclusters and kern.ipc.nmbuf? > Vick Khera says he sees explicitly set tunables on his > 2.3.2 system, yet my virgin installation of Nano pfSense 2.3.2 has no > explicit declarations? > > Vick, is your Supermicro A1SRi-2758F running an installation that came from > Netgate, or is it a community edition installation? If the latter, Full or > Nano? > > > On 1/25/2017 3:49 PM, Jim Pingle wrote: > > On 01/25/2017 01:10 PM, Karl Fife wrote: > >> The piece that's still missing for me is that there must have been > >> some change in default system setting for FreeBSD, or some other > >> change between versions, because the system booted fine with pfSense > >> v 2.2.6 > > Aside from what has already been suggested by others, it's possible > > that the newer drivers from FreeBSD 10.3 in pfSense 2.3.x enabled > > features on the NIC chipset that consumed more mbufs. For example, it > > might be using more queues per NIC by default than it did previously. > > > > Jim > > > > _______________________________________________ > > pfSense mailing list > > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list > > Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold > > _______________________________________________ > pfSense mailing list > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list > Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold > > _______________________________________________ > pfSense mailing list > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list > Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold > _______________________________________________ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
