Great idea! I went ahead and released two versions (one for the old
master and one for the new one with all the changes from the devel
branch).

https://github.com/openpgpjs/openpgpjs/releases

2014/1/6 Thomas Oberndörfer <[email protected]>:
> GitHub releases not only consist of the packed sources but you
> can also manually add files (and even a changelog).
>
> I think it's an ideal place to provide (minified) bundles for the user
> of the library.
>
> See: https://github.com/blog/1547-release-your-software
>
> Thomas
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Tankred Hase <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 2014/1/5 Sean Colyer <[email protected]>:
>>> What's the advantage of removing openpgp.js and openpgp.min.js?
>>>
>>> I think it makes more sense to provide people with something ready to use
>>> rather than requiring them to build it. Providing minified libraries seems
>>> the de facto standard for js libraries.
>>
>> I agree in terms of ease of use when providing a prebuilt lib. But
>> there are two downsides:
>>
>> 1. It bloats the git repo unnecessarily (not a huge problem in my opinion).
>>
>> 2. The build/commit workflow has to be done manually by every
>> developer that commits a change. Some may forget to build, which will
>> lead to inconsistencies.
>>
>> All in all I think it shouldn't be too much of a burden to users if
>> the build process is well documented in the README.md and is painless.
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> http://openpgpjs.org
>> Subscribe/unsubscribe: http://list.openpgpjs.org
> _______________________________________________
>
> http://openpgpjs.org
> Subscribe/unsubscribe: http://list.openpgpjs.org
_______________________________________________

http://openpgpjs.org
Subscribe/unsubscribe: http://list.openpgpjs.org

Reply via email to