[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi Jeff :-)
> > no offence, but you've got Holger Kruse onboard, ask him, he seems
> > to be TCP/IP guru :-)
>
> Well, Petr, that was part of the poking I'd end up doing! ;-) But I
> suspect, or I just think off hand before investigating, that the issue
> might be at the port interface level and not involving the actual udp
> socket code. Either way, it's great to have Holger on board!
Aha, so I missunderstood you, is it possible to udp talk with current
version of port implementation?
What about REBOL for Novell, will it use IPX/SPX? :-) (NDA? :-)
> > btw: REBOL should update their page with some info, as /Command was
> > announced some few months ago, and still nothing ...
>
> I'm sure the Command development team is listening.. :-)
Hey guys, still alive? IIRC Command was promissed last year's spring ...
so we are near one year delay. I hope Carl will release /Views really this
month :-)
>
> -jeff
>
> (It's gotta be late in Czech Republic... or maybe really early.. ?)
hmm, seems like another refinement to 'now ... e.g. /Zone "Czech Republic"
to be considered for REBOL? Actually it's 8-Jan-2000/20:38:05+1:00
As for refinements, I've never tried to use /custom /mode refinements. Do
they actually work?
-pekr-
