[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Aha, so I missunderstood you, is it possible to udp talk with
> > current version of port implementation?
>
> Yep:
>
> close insert open udp://somewhere:9090 "something"
>
> and "something" will, infact, be sent via udp to somewhere's 9090
> udp port (which I verified earlier today). For some reason it doesn't
> seem possible to create a udp listen port, though. I don't think, or
> at least never heard that anyone had ever really verified the udp
> stuff before (due to udp's lack of popularity I suppose) so I thought
> I'd take a peek it at. I think the problem with the udp listen ports
> is in the port interface. Perhaps they can be fixed before the next
> release.
What? Hehe, udp:// great. It was several times requested here, but noone
ever announced possibility of udp:// usage. Or am I wrong? As for fixing
the problem - yes, fix it. As for the next REBOL release ---- when? :-)
> > As for refinements, I've never tried to use /custom /mode
> > refinements. Do they actually work?
>
> Not sure about /custom... I'll add that to my ever growing poke
> list.. but /mode works like this:
>
> file: open/mode %test.txt [binary new]
>
> That's the same as:
>
> open/binary/new %test.txt
>
Ah great .... doc team - add it to the docs, please :-)
PS: What about Apache team - back in the work? Need SSI handler to work
properly here :-)
-pekr-
>
> -jeff
