> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Aha, so I missunderstood you, is it possible to udp talk with
> current version of port implementation?
Yep:
close insert open udp://somewhere:9090 "something"
and "something" will, infact, be sent via udp to somewhere's 9090
udp port (which I verified earlier today). For some reason it doesn't
seem possible to create a udp listen port, though. I don't think, or
at least never heard that anyone had ever really verified the udp
stuff before (due to udp's lack of popularity I suppose) so I thought
I'd take a peek it at. I think the problem with the udp listen ports
is in the port interface. Perhaps they can be fixed before the next
release.
> As for refinements, I've never tried to use /custom /mode
> refinements. Do they actually work?
Not sure about /custom... I'll add that to my ever growing poke
list.. but /mode works like this:
file: open/mode %test.txt [binary new]
That's the same as:
open/binary/new %test.txt
-jeff
