On 1/10/2000 at 5:12 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
{
As an end user, I shouldn't have to put up with this.
}
With all due respect, Cheryl, it's important to remember that none of
us are paying customers yet.
This is still the ground floor, and there are going to be rough edges.
If you think Rebol.org needs better technology (and, of course, it
does), a good response would be to provide the REBOL scripts that can
do the job the way you would like. From REBOL's viewpoint, it may be
better to leave it bare bones, hoping that someone will come along and
volunteer to improve it.
Right now, I think a lot of us would prefer REBOL put their extremely
limited resources into getting REBOL/View and REBOL/Command out the
door. Any of us could help to improve the Web site if we chose, but
right now only REBOL Tech can work on these other products.
-Ted.
- [REBOL] archive fuchs
- [REBOL] archive Re: xmldiva
- [REBOL] archive Re:(2) schlae
- [REBOL] archive Re:(2) schlae
- [REBOL] rebol.org purpose (was "archive" ) bobr
- [REBOL] rebol.org purpose (was "archive&quo... xmldiva
- [REBOL] rebol.org purpose (was "archive... icimjs
- [REBOL] rebol.org purpose (was "ar... xmldiva
- [REBOL] rebol.org purpose (was &quo... joel . neely
- [REBOL] rebol.org purpose (was ... xmldiva
- [REBOL] rebol.org purpose (was ... news . ted
- [REBOL] rebol.org purpose (was ... icimjs
- [REBOL] rebol.org purpose (was ... xmldiva
- [REBOL] rebol.org purpose (was ... icimjs
- [REBOL] rebol.org purpose (was ... news . ted
- [REBOL] rebol.org purpose (was &quo... Al . Bri
- [REBOL] rebol.org purpose (was ... xmldiva
- [REBOL] rebol.org purpose (was ... Al . Bri
- [REBOL] rebol.org purpose (was &quo... bobr
- [REBOL] rebol.org purpose (was &quo... news . ted
- [REBOL] rebol.org purpose (was &quo... icimjs
