I'm going to have to agree with Micky on this issue. Herrod, if what
you are saying is true then wouldn't this be valid for not only the
entire site but also the entire web? "the fact that pages are linked to
each other implies a relationship" Yes, that is true - but wouldn't your
theory suggest that only ONE page on ONE site on the ENTIRE internet
have an H1?
Herrod, Lisa wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Micky Mourelo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
The important factor here it consistency across the site.
Are you sure? I find myself often debating this sort of issue.
I don't
think tagging a subsection as H3 on one page should mean that that
subsection will always be marked as an H3; in fact I know it
shouldn't, if you do not mention the section(e.g. H2) on the document
you should not tag the subsection as H3.
HTML marks documents not sites.
My interpretation of this issue is that we're talking about the consistent
application of hierarchical elements and therefore, their semantic meaning
to a user. Who are the typical users who rely on this type of
element/markup?
Micky, I understand your point that HTML marks up pages and not sites, but
the fact that pages are linked to each other implies a relationship, doesn't
it? So for that reason I would agree with Patrick's comment.
******************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************
******************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************
