Kat

It might be good if you can quickly send us the text you're referring to in
the draft so that others can read it as it is there.

I just had a look in my print out but don't have time to look it up online
right now to post it here.

Are you talking about 'related resources' under 'examples of success
criterion 1.2.4' ?

The 'Related resources' in the draft only relates to ASL (American sign
language), so it could be misleading. 

The guideline should specify use of the native sign language of a country,
but how do you implement that effectively on the web, which is global?
Gestuno (International sign http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gestuno) would be
useless to most deaf IMHO. This is potentially a very, very interesting
topic of discussion - just think about how the telephone and other auditory
means of communication across borders have influenced the spread of English.



I'll have to get back to this tomorrow when I have more time.

Any other comments, guys?

all the best,

Lisa Herrod


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Katrina [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, 28 April 2006 2:47 PM
>To: Web Standards Group
>Subject: [WSG] WCAG 2.0
>
>
>What do people think about the sign language thing?
>
>Guideline 1.2 sounds a bit suss to me; maybe I have not understood?
>
>Can someone please explain to me how the audio descriptions of video 
>provide both level 1 and level 2 compliance?
>
>Also, how can you get level 3 compliance with an audio description 
>(1.2.2 and 1.2.3) and a sign-language interpreter (1.2.5), using 
>American sign language? That is *useless* to my little sister who is 
>severly-hearing impaired, and doesn't use American sign language.
>
>?????
>
>Kat
>I must not have understood.
>******************************************************
>The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
>
> See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
>******************************************************
>
******************************************************
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************

Reply via email to