Andreas Boehmer [Addictive Media] wrote:
This is the best comment I read all day. Why not use unusual fonts to make the design look good (of course keeping legibility in mind - that is part of a good design)
Because, if it's unusual, you can rest assured that 99.9999% of your visitors won't have it, so you might as well not do it.
Provide a fall-back for those users that don't have the font and make sure your design still works and the font is still easy to read.
I thought this part was just common knowledge? P -- Patrick H. Lauke __________________________________________________________ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com __________________________________________________________ Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force http://webstandards.org/ __________________________________________________________ ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
