It would be good if the WSG produce a response which could be signed up to by a large majority of the members.  This then could be forwarded by each member in agreement to the appropriate contact at the BBC, so amplifying the message.  It may get to the attention of the BBC editorial staff and generate some publicity for both web standards and of course the WSG

WSG as a lobby group anyone ?

- Rob

On 30/10/06, Patrick H. Lauke <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
Quoting Web Dandy Design <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >:

> The BBC did ask for feedback so it maybe worth trying to give a balanced
> opinion and correct some of the inaccuracies of the article/broadcast.

Does "your article is a crock of misinformed sh*t" count as balanced?

P
--
Patrick H. Lauke
__________________________________________________________
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
__________________________________________________________
Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
http://webstandards.org/
__________________________________________________________


*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************



*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************

Reply via email to