Nick Fitzsimons wrote: > Basically, what it all comes down to is that you shouldn't use CSS to > arrange content in such a way as to add meaning: the content should > be marked up in a meaningful way to start with.
> Given that moving around the "chunks" of a page (navigation, header, > etc.) doesn't actually add further meaning to the content of those > chunks, those considerations don't (IMHO) apply in the case under > discussion. I'd agree and I'm glad I said I was not sure :) But playing the devil advocate: why if the meaning of a navigation menu is to be at the bottom of the document would make one display it at the top, near a header? I don't think it'd be just because of the fear it would display below the fold. I think "mental* representation" of the whole document is part of the problem here. * I'm not sure I'm using the correct English word here (but it makes sense in french ;) --- Regards, Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
