On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Charlie Brady wrote: >On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Adrian Kubala wrote: >> Anyways, do I take it that the bincimap developers don't consider this a >> bug and I should plan on fixing it myself if that's what I want? >If you are able to fix it yourself, why don't you? Obviously it's >bothering you. I'm sure the developers won't mind you submitting a patch >:-)
One of the larger scheme changes I'm working on is moving details out of the operators and into the depot and mailbox children. ListOperator might be hard to read out, especially since all superior mailboxes are automatically added when an inferior is detected. I can do this fix for now, but patches are as you all say a _very_ good help for me. If not to fix the bug directly, it usually gives me a good idea of what the submitter thinks is wrong. :) Andy -- Andreas Aardal Hanssen | http://www.andreas.hanssen.name/gpg Author of Binc IMAP | Nil desperandum
