[image: Inline image 1] On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Charles Hiland <[email protected] > wrote:
> The end result is redundancy in our primary server and SQL database. > > > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Jason Wallace > *Sent:* Monday, October 05, 2015 12:47 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [mssms] SCCM Redundancy Best Practices > > > > Nooooooo! > > > > How many clients do you have? > > > > In CM16 you can have 200,000 clients. > > > > What do you expect to see from your new design? > > > On 5 Oct 2015, at 17:41, Charles Hiland <[email protected] > <[email protected]>> wrote: > > We will be upgrading to SCCM 2016 next year, and I’m trying to figure out > an ideal redundancy setup. At the moment we have one primary and 7 > secondary sites (the secondary sites are just DPs). Does anyone have any > ideas for best practice when it comes to redundancy? > > > Currently we are thinking an off-site CAS with two primary servers. Do > any common-place rules stand out that I am overlooking? > > Thanks in advance, > > Charlie > > > > > > > >
