I have seen a couple of designs where the thinking was that having a PRI in each Datacenter would allow you to continue to run the environment in the event of a complete Datacenter failure.
I have even seen one where they then (within the Datacenter) scaled out a new secondary site for every 25,000 clients. Not my designs I hasten to add > On 5 Oct 2015, at 18:40, Jason Sandys <[email protected]> wrote: > > What’s an offsite primary server? Are you talking about a cold-stand-by > server that you would perform a restore on? > > J > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Charles Hiland > Sent: Monday, October 5, 2015 12:32 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [mssms] SCCM Redundancy Best Practices > > Thanks, Jason and others for the input, and Garth for the laugh J, and please > forgive my semantics – I didn’t mean secondary sites (to me if they’re not > primary, they’re secondary. Apologies!). > > I think from what I’ve heard from feedback is that our best option moving > forward may be to have an off-site primary server. We currently have an > on-site primary, and want to have a setup where an office being out of > commission (e.g. Hurricane Sandy) doesn’t impact all of our smaller, remote > offices. > > Thank you for the feedback! > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Jason Sandys > Sent: Monday, October 05, 2015 1:16 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [mssms] SCCM Redundancy Best Practices > > +150,000 > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Ryan > Sent: Monday, October 5, 2015 12:12 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [mssms] SCCM Redundancy Best Practices > > > > On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Charles Hiland <[email protected]> > wrote: > The end result is redundancy in our primary server and SQL database. > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Jason Wallace > Sent: Monday, October 05, 2015 12:47 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [mssms] SCCM Redundancy Best Practices > > Nooooooo! > > How many clients do you have? > > In CM16 you can have 200,000 clients. > > What do you expect to see from your new design? > > On 5 Oct 2015, at 17:41, Charles Hiland <[email protected]> wrote: > > We will be upgrading to SCCM 2016 next year, and I’m trying to figure out an > ideal redundancy setup. At the moment we have one primary and 7 secondary > sites (the secondary sites are just DPs). Does anyone have any ideas for > best practice when it comes to redundancy? > > Currently we are thinking an off-site CAS with two primary servers. Do any > common-place rules stand out that I am overlooking? > > Thanks in advance, > Charlie > > > > > > > > >
