+150,000 From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ryan Sent: Monday, October 5, 2015 12:12 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [mssms] SCCM Redundancy Best Practices
[Inline image 1] On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Charles Hiland <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: The end result is redundancy in our primary server and SQL database. From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Jason Wallace Sent: Monday, October 05, 2015 12:47 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [mssms] SCCM Redundancy Best Practices Nooooooo! How many clients do you have? In CM16 you can have 200,000 clients. What do you expect to see from your new design? On 5 Oct 2015, at 17:41, Charles Hiland <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: We will be upgrading to SCCM 2016 next year, and I’m trying to figure out an ideal redundancy setup. At the moment we have one primary and 7 secondary sites (the secondary sites are just DPs). Does anyone have any ideas for best practice when it comes to redundancy? Currently we are thinking an off-site CAS with two primary servers. Do any common-place rules stand out that I am overlooking? Thanks in advance, Charlie
