As someone who originally had a CAS and had to fight with management for 2 years to convince them we were shooting ourselves in the foot and then spend a good portion of this year figuring out how to migrate from an existing CAS hierarchy to a single primary hierarchy with minimal downtime: You don't want a CAS
----- Dwayne Allen [email protected] (479) 310-0027 On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Mike Dzikowski < [email protected]> wrote: > I hadn't been on the list all day. This made my Monday :) > > Thanks Ryan! > > ------------------------------ > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [mssms] SCCM Redundancy Best Practices > Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 17:55:38 +0000 > > X 150,000 > > > > J > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Jason Sandys > *Sent:* Monday, October 5, 2015 1:16 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* RE: [mssms] SCCM Redundancy Best Practices > > > > +150,000 > > > > *From:* [email protected] [ > mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *Ryan > *Sent:* Monday, October 5, 2015 12:12 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [mssms] SCCM Redundancy Best Practices > > > > [image: Inline image 1] > > > > On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Charles Hiland < > [email protected]> wrote: > > The end result is redundancy in our primary server and SQL database. > > > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Jason Wallace > *Sent:* Monday, October 05, 2015 12:47 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [mssms] SCCM Redundancy Best Practices > > > > Nooooooo! > > > > How many clients do you have? > > > > In CM16 you can have 200,000 clients. > > > > What do you expect to see from your new design? > > > On 5 Oct 2015, at 17:41, Charles Hiland <[email protected] > <[email protected]>> wrote: > > We will be upgrading to SCCM 2016 next year, and I’m trying to figure out > an ideal redundancy setup. At the moment we have one primary and 7 > secondary sites (the secondary sites are just DPs). Does anyone have any > ideas for best practice when it comes to redundancy? > > > Currently we are thinking an off-site CAS with two primary servers. Do > any common-place rules stand out that I am overlooking? > > Thanks in advance, > > Charlie > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
