yes 2-3x is substantial, but not at the cost of safety and not compared to the 
5-10x the gas bike were getting, but you are right Cd is not everything so just 
changing Cd in an equation might not produce real useful predictions

  and as someone pointed out low drag is only important at high speeds and 
under ideal conditions.  until we can make ebikes go over 100 miles on a charge 
[yes we can now, but most of use can't afford the batteries] then focusing on 
improvements in long duration, high speed travel is not a major concern to me 
right now.
   
  i would like to learn more about how to reduce drag though, for example i've 
been toying with the idea of studying effects of tassels on the rear of a bike. 
 i would like to know if having a series of tassels on the rear would break up 
the air and thus reduce drag?  since i'm more of a chopper fellow wearing a 
leather jacket with tassels and a seat and saddle bags with tassels would be a 
simple addition.
   
  and is there any data on the effects of wind shields on bikes? angles, sizes? 
maybe vetter knows?
  
john fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 
  don't know bidwell's calcs.

2-3 X qualifies as "substantial" to me, while 30% does not.
Vetter used to be interested in LSR racing. Those designs aren't usable for 
street or track.

CD is not the only factor in aero calcs - its wildly misused all over the 
internet. In fact most say the tail is more
important than the nose. The thing *I* think its important to remember is you 
can't calculate the actual drag without
either 1) a cad model and major-league software on huge hardware, or 2) a wind 
tunnel that lets you test the bike at
lean. You can mount the bike on a trailer and get some idea, but my point is, 
its really hard to measure aero effects.

That said, everybody guesstimates based on previous designs.

theres some other good, trustworthy links out there, I'll look tonight. 
Wikipedia may be pretty good on this by now.

dale henderson wrote:
> i got my results from the equation found in biddwells [spelling] "EL 
> CHOPPER". i've found the equation works very well for my current bikes, so i 
> just tried reducing the Cd, i even tried 0.1,




harry

Albuquerque, NM
http://geocities.com/hendersonmotorcycles/blog.html
http://www.austinev.org/evalbum/1179
http://geocities.com/solarcookingman
 __________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Reply via email to