On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Angelos Tzotsos <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11/18/2015 11:33 AM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: >> >> Perhaps we should compile a list of which packages are not yet >> supporting GDAL 2.x to ease discussion? >> Packages relying only on the C API don't need a change. >> >> One of the reasons I'm a bit pushy for gdal 2 is that I's love to have >> Xerial released with gdal 2, otherwise we will be stuck with the "old" >> version in the LTS release. If I'm not mistaking, fedora is also >> already using GDAL 2.
> > As far as I know, OTB is preparing a 5.2 release to support GDAL 2.x and > ZOO-Project is preparing for a 1.6.0 release too. We can build those against GDAL 1.11.2 if it is really needed. The library packages can coexist (but packages will have to be build in a ppa without GDAL 2). Kind Regards, Johan _______________________________________________ Live-demo mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo http://live.osgeo.org http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
