Hi Julien,
Thanks for offering to help with translations. I'm looping in Niko and
Vicky who are currently wrestling with trying to get transifex to work.
If you are familiar with it, you might be able to help them.
Warm regards, Cameron
On 2/6/17 3:22 am, Julien Moquet wrote:
Hi,
>> It would be ok to say "Proj4 has been translated into other
languages, including proj4js, ..."
> Agreed that metacrs is probably a bit too ..
I am fully agree too.
And as OsGeoLive aims to be multilanguages, I can help on the proj4
French Translation pages.
Regards,
2017-05-31 22:15 GMT+02:00 Even Rouault <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>:
On jeudi 1 juin 2017 05:57:38 CEST Cameron Shorter wrote:
> Hi Evan,
>
> Yes, MetaCRS was a project gathering all the Proj4 projects together.
> However, it appears that proj4 is the only project in that grouping
> which is active?
>
> Hence my thoughts are that "MetaCRS" should be dropped from
OSGeo-Live
> as a concept and "Proj4" be used instead. It would be ok to say
"Proj4
> has been translated into other languages, including proj4js, ..."
>
> Your thoughts are welcome.
Regarding what is listed currently in metacrs :
- proj4js: no opinion
- cs-map: no-opinion
- geotiff/libgeotiff: heavily used underneath by GDAL in
particular, mostly in maintaince mode, but can be treated as a
technical dependency that doesn't require to be visible from users.
- proj4j: no opinion
- spatialreference.org <http://spatialreference.org>: not
maintained in years. http://epsg.io/ would be a possible replacement
Agreed that metacrs is probably a bit too ... meta for folks
exploring OSGeo-Live content, so it could make sense exposing
proj.4 as a standalone project.
--
Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
http://www.spatialys.com
--
Cameron Shorter
M +61 419 142 254
_______________________________________________
Live-demo mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
http://live.osgeo.org
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
