Hi Vicky, Do you mean we got 5 days to make the changes requested otherwise proj4 will be out of OSGEO live ?
The version are not the good ones on the overview. I think it is the only change that can be done on the 11 languages ! May be we shall kick out MetaCRS later ? Also, as I read mapserver quickstart, I think we can make a quickstart out of : https://github.com/OSGeo/proj.4/blob/master/docs/source/apps/proj.rst https://github.com/OSGeo/proj.4/blob/master/docs/source/apps/geod.rst https://github.com/OSGeo/proj.4/blob/master/docs/source/apps/cs2cs.rst with a final link to http://proj4.org/index.html. @Kbevers Hi Kristian, What do you think of it ? It's easy to provide and maintain. Regards, Julien. 2017-06-11 18:11 GMT+02:00 Vicky Vergara <[email protected]>: > Hi Julien, et all > Maybe you can help me. > It so happened that I sent another mail asking about what version to use, > while reviewing today, I saw that I didn't send the mail to proj4. > (my mail merge skills are not so good) > > So, here is the hand made mail: > > > Hi all, > > With the upcoming OSGeo-Live 11.0 reboot, we will be re-inserting each > project into the OSGeo-Live baseline once someone from each project has > replied to confirm that they have reviewed docs and verified the > application works as expected. > > Can you please: > 0. Reply by return email to confirm that you have recieved this email and > that you are able to check docs within the next 2 weeks. (sooner would be > better if you can) > 1. Reply to confirm the Project Overview is still accurate, or has been > updated, (and version numbers are correct) > 2. Reply to confirm you have run a recent OSGeo-Live version (the > previous 10.5 version is ok), and updated the quickstart where needed. > We understand that version 4.9.2 of proj4 will be installed on OSGeo-Live > 11.0 (Version 4.9.2 was installed on OSGeo-Live 10.5.) > (all in one reply is ok) > > Full package status can be seen here: > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Q5BaEgQtgw4O1bXyeWMl > M8XtAOhUgcjZ7Y2O0FZc2H0/edit?hl=en_GB#gid=2014800150 > > Key Milestones > ------------------- > 18-Jun-2017 All docs reviewed and verified > 21-Jun-2017 OSGeo-Live delivered to UAT (final application versions > installed - Beta stage) > 24-Jul-2017 OSGeo-Live Final ISO > 14-Aug-2017 FOSS4G 2017 Boston > > ... full schedule http://spreadsheets.google.com > /ccc?key=0Al9zh8DjmU_RdE1SYUN3YWJ2N1NpSUczbW9IRWZNclE&hl=en_GB > > > > > On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Cameron Shorter <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> Hi Julien, >> >> Thanks for offering to help with translations. I'm looping in Niko and >> Vicky who are currently wrestling with trying to get transifex to work. If >> you are familiar with it, you might be able to help them. >> >> Warm regards, Cameron >> >> On 2/6/17 3:22 am, Julien Moquet wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> It would be ok to say "Proj4 has been translated into other languages, >> including proj4js, ..." >> > Agreed that metacrs is probably a bit too .. >> >> I am fully agree too. >> >> >> >> >> And as OsGeoLive aims to be multilanguages, I can help on the proj4 >> French Translation pages. >> >> Regards, >> >> >> 2017-05-31 22:15 GMT+02:00 Even Rouault <[email protected]>: >> >>> On jeudi 1 juin 2017 05:57:38 CEST Cameron Shorter wrote: >>> >>> > Hi Evan, >>> >>> > >>> >>> > Yes, MetaCRS was a project gathering all the Proj4 projects together. >>> >>> > However, it appears that proj4 is the only project in that grouping >>> >>> > which is active? >>> >>> > >>> >>> > Hence my thoughts are that "MetaCRS" should be dropped from OSGeo-Live >>> >>> > as a concept and "Proj4" be used instead. It would be ok to say "Proj4 >>> >>> > has been translated into other languages, including proj4js, ..." >>> >>> > >>> >>> > Your thoughts are welcome. >>> >>> >>> >>> Regarding what is listed currently in metacrs : >>> >>> - proj4js: no opinion >>> >>> - cs-map: no-opinion >>> >>> - geotiff/libgeotiff: heavily used underneath by GDAL in particular, >>> mostly in maintaince mode, but can be treated as a technical dependency >>> that doesn't require to be visible from users. >>> >>> - proj4j: no opinion >>> >>> - spatialreference.org: not maintained in years. http://epsg.io/ would >>> be a possible replacement >>> >>> >>> >>> Agreed that metacrs is probably a bit too ... meta for folks exploring >>> OSGeo-Live content, so it could make sense exposing proj.4 as a standalone >>> project. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Spatialys - Geospatial professional services >>> >>> http://www.spatialys.com >>> >> >> >> -- >> Cameron Shorter >> M +61 419 142 254 <+61%20419%20142%20254> >> >> > > > -- > > Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt) > Salzmannstraße 44, > 81739 München, Germany > > Vicky Vergara > Operations Research > > eMail: [email protected] > Web: https://georepublic.info > > Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1 > Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9 > > Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428 > CEO: Daniel Kastl > > >
_______________________________________________ Live-demo mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo http://live.osgeo.org http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
