Hi Vicky, I am downloading the 10.5 iso in order to make the test.
I had a look to pgRouting's quickstart, and made a very few change : are you agree to be proj4's quickstart's reviewer ? Regards, Julien. 2017-06-14 20:29 GMT+02:00 Julien Moquet <[email protected]>: > Hi Vicky, > > I am not in the incubating list as a human being, but metacrs is : > http://www.osgeo.org/incubator > > > I'll have a look on pgRouting. > > Regards, > Julien. > > > 2017-06-14 3:02 GMT+02:00 Vicky Vergara <[email protected]>: > >> Hello Julien, >> >> Now about the documentation >> I see you've worked on your fork, these are the differences: >> is that correct? >> https://github.com/OSGeo/OSGeoLive-doc/compare/master...julien2512:master >> >> I dont think you are incubating project (I dont see it in the list of >> incubating projects), so this might not apply. >> >> .. image:: ../../images/logos/OSGeo_incubation.png >> :scale: 100 % >> :alt: OSGeo Project >> :align: right >> :target: http://www.osgeo.org/incubator/process/principles.html >> >> >> But I see you advanced a lot on the documentation 👍 >> You might as well do the PR so that the other members of the team can >> give you feed back. >> >> Vicky. >> >> PS, in pgRouting the documentation is done in such a way, to make >> minimal changes in further releases of OSGeo Live. >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Julien Moquet <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Vicky, >>> >>> My fork is up to date regarding the overview and quickstart: >>> https://github.com/julien2512/OSGeoLive-doc >>> >>> Before making a pull request, I need to test it over the OsGeoLive-10.5 >>> (on wednesday or thursday). >>> >>> Although, as I read the sources.list include in this version, I don't >>> really think the latest proj4 will be used. >>> The ubuntugis is used for that, and there is only the stable 4.8.0-3 >>> proj4 release to be used. >>> See : http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntugis/ubuntugis-unstable/ubuntu >>> /pool/main/p/proj/ >>> and https://github.com/OSGeo/OSGeoLive/blob/osgeolive_10_5/sourc >>> es.list.d/ubuntugis.list >>> >>> That's why I finally don't have to change the proj4 release on its >>> overview. >>> I only bypass the metacrs and stuff. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Julien. >>> >>> >>> 2017-06-11 18:11 GMT+02:00 Vicky Vergara <[email protected]>: >>> >>>> Hi Julien, et all >>>> Maybe you can help me. >>>> It so happened that I sent another mail asking about what version to >>>> use, while reviewing today, I saw that I didn't send the mail to proj4. >>>> (my mail merge skills are not so good) >>>> >>>> So, here is the hand made mail: >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> With the upcoming OSGeo-Live 11.0 reboot, we will be re-inserting each >>>> project into the OSGeo-Live baseline once someone from each project has >>>> replied to confirm that they have reviewed docs and verified the >>>> application works as expected. >>>> >>>> Can you please: >>>> 0. Reply by return email to confirm that you have recieved this email >>>> and that you are able to check docs within the next 2 weeks. (sooner would >>>> be better if you can) >>>> 1. Reply to confirm the Project Overview is still accurate, or has >>>> been updated, (and version numbers are correct) >>>> 2. Reply to confirm you have run a recent OSGeo-Live version (the >>>> previous 10.5 version is ok), and updated the quickstart where needed. >>>> We understand that version 4.9.2 of proj4 will be installed on >>>> OSGeo-Live 11.0 (Version 4.9.2 was installed on OSGeo-Live 10.5.) >>>> (all in one reply is ok) >>>> >>>> Full package status can be seen here: >>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Q5BaEgQtgw4O1bXyeWMl >>>> M8XtAOhUgcjZ7Y2O0FZc2H0/edit?hl=en_GB#gid=2014800150 >>>> >>>> Key Milestones >>>> ------------------- >>>> 18-Jun-2017 All docs reviewed and verified >>>> 21-Jun-2017 OSGeo-Live delivered to UAT (final application versions >>>> installed - Beta stage) >>>> 24-Jul-2017 OSGeo-Live Final ISO >>>> 14-Aug-2017 FOSS4G 2017 Boston >>>> >>>> ... full schedule http://spreadsheets.google.com >>>> /ccc?key=0Al9zh8DjmU_RdE1SYUN3YWJ2N1NpSUczbW9IRWZNclE&hl=en_GB >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Cameron Shorter < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Julien, >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for offering to help with translations. I'm looping in Niko and >>>>> Vicky who are currently wrestling with trying to get transifex to work. If >>>>> you are familiar with it, you might be able to help them. >>>>> >>>>> Warm regards, Cameron >>>>> >>>>> On 2/6/17 3:22 am, Julien Moquet wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> >> It would be ok to say "Proj4 has been translated into other >>>>> languages, including proj4js, ..." >>>>> > Agreed that metacrs is probably a bit too .. >>>>> >>>>> I am fully agree too. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> And as OsGeoLive aims to be multilanguages, I can help on the proj4 >>>>> French Translation pages. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2017-05-31 22:15 GMT+02:00 Even Rouault <[email protected]>: >>>>> >>>>>> On jeudi 1 juin 2017 05:57:38 CEST Cameron Shorter wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> > Hi Evan, >>>>>> >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> > Yes, MetaCRS was a project gathering all the Proj4 projects >>>>>> together. >>>>>> >>>>>> > However, it appears that proj4 is the only project in that grouping >>>>>> >>>>>> > which is active? >>>>>> >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> > Hence my thoughts are that "MetaCRS" should be dropped from >>>>>> OSGeo-Live >>>>>> >>>>>> > as a concept and "Proj4" be used instead. It would be ok to say >>>>>> "Proj4 >>>>>> >>>>>> > has been translated into other languages, including proj4js, ..." >>>>>> >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> > Your thoughts are welcome. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Regarding what is listed currently in metacrs : >>>>>> >>>>>> - proj4js: no opinion >>>>>> >>>>>> - cs-map: no-opinion >>>>>> >>>>>> - geotiff/libgeotiff: heavily used underneath by GDAL in particular, >>>>>> mostly in maintaince mode, but can be treated as a technical dependency >>>>>> that doesn't require to be visible from users. >>>>>> >>>>>> - proj4j: no opinion >>>>>> >>>>>> - spatialreference.org: not maintained in years. http://epsg.io/ >>>>>> would be a possible replacement >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Agreed that metacrs is probably a bit too ... meta for folks >>>>>> exploring OSGeo-Live content, so it could make sense exposing proj.4 as a >>>>>> standalone project. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>>> Spatialys - Geospatial professional services >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.spatialys.com >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Cameron Shorter >>>>> M +61 419 142 254 <+61%20419%20142%20254> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt) >>>> Salzmannstraße 44, >>>> 81739 München, Germany >>>> >>>> Vicky Vergara >>>> Operations Research >>>> >>>> eMail: [email protected] >>>> Web: https://georepublic.info >>>> >>>> Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1 >>>> Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9 >>>> >>>> Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428 >>>> CEO: Daniel Kastl >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> >> Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt) >> Salzmannstraße 44, >> 81739 München, Germany >> >> Vicky Vergara >> Operations Research >> >> eMail: [email protected] >> Web: https://georepublic.info >> >> Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1 >> Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9 >> >> Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428 >> CEO: Daniel Kastl >> >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Live-demo mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo http://live.osgeo.org http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
