[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> When we get finished with the "latching relay" discussion could we look 
> at electric propulsion? I would love to hear about the pros and cons 
> from you guys that know electricity. AC motors, DC motors, permanent 
> magnet motors, controllers, new battery technology (Lithium titanate 
> nano). What does "traction motor" mean? Does a larger diameter motor had 
> more torque than a skinny motor, other things equal? etc. There seems to 
> be brushless AC and DC motors. How do they do that? Does a controller 
> control DC current or AC frequency or what? I need educating.
>  
> Ed Schwerin

I have given this a lot of thought and research, 
and have come to the conclusion that the best 
approach for a small cruising sailboat would look 
like this;

A small diesel genset, (around 5 kw for my 25 ft 
boat would supply hull speed propulsion), running 
at 115 VAC or 240 VAC which would be able to 
supply the propulsion motor directly (either a 
permanent magnet brushless type or an Perm mag AC 
brushless type) through a very efficient 
controller, like at least 96% efficient. The 
genset could also supply power to the house bank, 
(a set of AGMs most likely, just enough battery 
capacity to supply 30 nm or so at 80% hull 
speed...this means I would NOT have a massive, 
heavy, expensive battery bank.)

The house bank could supply power to the 
propulsion motor by itself through an inverter 
although in this mode the boat would not be able 
to achieve hull speed, only 70-80% of that, but 
since it would only be used in pure electric mode 
to get away from a mooring or slip or across the 
bar or maybe to back off a mud bank, or to move 
out of the way of the ship at night in a flat 
calm, or as a get home in calms with no fuel back 
up, this is fine.

It would be set up so that it would be able to 
power under the electric propulsion motor drawing 
electric power from the genset, OR from the 
batteries, but not both at once, although the 
genset would be able to supply power to the 
propulsion motor and charge the batteries at the 
same time. This is just to keep things simple and 
cheap.

The system would NOT have regen, as I think that 
slows a boat down while sailing more than running 
a wind genny does.

The reason I would use high voltage is because it 
allows a more efficient controller to be used, the 
higher voltage electric motors are more efficient, 
and the cable size needed is much smaller. Another 
issue is that with a low voltage high current set 
up, any corrosion in connectors is more likely to 
cause a fire.

I would use off the shelf gensets, controllers, 
and motors, so that if any module failed it would 
be easy to find at least a temporary replacement, 
and they would be much less costly than custom or 
proprietary units.

I would make it so that I would be able to by-pass 
the controller for a get home mode in the event of 
controller failure, it would then have full power 
on or off, but that would suffice as a minute 
emergency powered mode.

Some of the other advantages would be a huge 
genset capacity for a small boat (I could run AC 
at anchor or power sand the hull in a yard that 
had no power)and lots of redundancy, with the wind 
and solar power I have I would bet I could cruise 
for a very long time without needing fuel, and 
this set up would more than triple the fuel range 
compared to my atomic four. In fact it would get 
better fuel mileage than a standard diesel 
installation, since with this set up the engine 
would be running at a more fuel efficient 
RPM/loading most of the time.

I would NOT use new batteries other than AGMs, as 
they are still too problematic.

As far as diameter of motors, no, a smaller 
diameter is not unnecessarily less powerfully, it 
depends on many things, but if two motors are of 
the same design, and are running at the same RPM, 
then yes the smaller one would generally be less 
powerful.

In any case in general if two motors use the same 
amount of current at the same voltage and both are 
reasonably efficient, they will be very close to 
the same power output, although the torque curves 
may well differ and the design RPM may as well.

Controllers fall into several categories, the most 
common are pulse width modulation for DC motors, 
less common is freq modulation control for them 
where the number of pulses per unit time is what 
is controlled not how long the pulse is, and for 
ac motors, yes freq control is a common way of 
doing it but for smaller motors controlling the 
amplitude of the peak voltage is also common.

Brushless designs mostly use semiconductors (hall 
effect magnetic type or optical type) to sense 
motor rotor position and then that controls a 
semiconductor switch that reverses the applied 
polarity just as a brush would do otherwise. There 
are many advantages to this besides no brush wear, 
among them being able to control the 'timing' of 
the commutation at different RPMs, and
better control over the switching itself. It also 
makes a more compact motor.

Brushless perm mag motors can be as high as 97% 
efficient with a very flat torque curve, meaning 
that as the motors speed slows the torque goes up, 
and at very slow speeds the torque can be huge 
unlike other electric motors and internal 
combustion engines, so if you snagged a net for 
example, you could rip the shaft out of the boat 
in the blink of an eye if you did not have peak 
torque limiting of some sort. This can be electric 
sensing in the controller or mechanical such as a 
toothed belt or keyed pulley, or both.

The controllers can also be tremendously 
efficient, and when the entire system is 
considered over its RPM and torque range, it is 
quite possible that it can be more efficient than 
a standard set up.

I say that to emphasize what has made such a 
design practical today...efficiency. Without this, 
you have a system that is just not as practical as 
a standard direct drive IC engine installation. 
Also the  size and cost of the equipment has gone 
down a lot over the last 15 years or so.

Hope this gives you something to think about. -Ken











_______________________________________________
Liveaboard mailing list
Liveaboard@liveaboardnow.org
To adjust your membership settings over the web 
http://www.liveaboardnow.org/mailman/listinfo/liveaboard
To subscribe send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The archives are at http://www.liveaboardnow.org/pipermail/liveaboard/

To search the archives http://www.mail-archive.com/liveaboard@liveaboardnow.org

The Mailman Users Guide can be found here 
http://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/mailman-member/index.html

Reply via email to