If we are thinking of building a readline/editline/other line editor package as part of LLDB, we might take a look around and see if there aren't any other non GPLv3 line editors we would rather use.
I have heard that zsh might have a nice line editor that could be used. I am not sure how well libedit stacks up to competing line editors. Greg Clayton On Jul 3, 2013, at 11:14 AM, Matthew Sorrels <[email protected]> wrote: > Looking at libedit was on my list, so I'll take a look at this and see what > can be done. > > > On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Ed Maste <[email protected]> wrote: > On 3 July 2013 11:49, Malea, Daniel <[email protected]> wrote: > > It's a bug — I've heard reports that building against a newer libedit will > > fix the problem: > > > > http://www.thrysoee.dk/editline/ > > > > However, most distributions ship with an ancient version. I'm not sure if > > there's any (licensing or other) restrictions that would prevent someone > > from checking in the updated libedit into lldb source tree…I haven't really > > had time to look at this problem in detail though.. > > For what it's worth, on FreeBSD lldb picks up the base system's > libedit, which shares a common ancestry with NetBSD. This problem is > not reproducible here. > > _______________________________________________ > lldb-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
