On 09/07/2013 17:48, Michael Sartain wrote: > On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 5:24 AM, Sylvestre Ledru <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Sure. I could backport it for the distributions I am supporting on > llvm.org/apt/ <http://llvm.org/apt/>. > > However, before doing so, I would just like to hear back from the > current libedit maintainer (to avoid duplicating the work on the > package). > > > In case anyone else is running into prompt issues on Linux, we took > libedit 3.1, compiled it, shoved it in lldb/extern/libedit/libedit-3.1 > and made the changes below to our working lldb source tree. > ( https://bitbucket.org/mikesart/lldb_branch ) This is allowing us to > get around these issues until a more official solution is worked out. Thanks for the feedback.
By the way, I have the agreement from the current maintainer of libedit in Debian/Ubuntu to help him with the packaging. I pushed the almost finished version here: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/libedit.git;a=summary The main thing remaining to check is the consistency of the API between the old release that we had and this one. I will do that in a couple of weeks (I am off). Sylvestre _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
