On 11/07/2013 20:44, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > On 09/07/2013 17:48, Michael Sartain wrote: >> On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 5:24 AM, Sylvestre Ledru <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Sure. I could backport it for the distributions I am supporting on >> llvm.org/apt/ <http://llvm.org/apt/>. >> >> However, before doing so, I would just like to hear back from the >> current libedit maintainer (to avoid duplicating the work on the >> package). >> >> >> In case anyone else is running into prompt issues on Linux, we took >> libedit 3.1, compiled it, shoved it in lldb/extern/libedit/libedit-3.1 >> and made the changes below to our working lldb source tree. >> ( https://bitbucket.org/mikesart/lldb_branch ) This is allowing us to >> get around these issues until a more official solution is worked out. > Thanks for the feedback. > > By the way, I have the agreement from the current maintainer of libedit > in Debian/Ubuntu to help him with the packaging. > > I pushed the almost finished version here: > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/libedit.git;a=summary > > The main thing remaining to check is the consistency of the API between > the old release that we had and this one. I will do that in a couple of > weeks (I am off). > I uploaded the latest version of libedit in Debian experimental: http://packages.qa.debian.org/libe/libedit.html and requested a sync for Ubuntu Saucy: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208524
Hopefully, this will fix the lldb issues. I requested for feedback from some Debian maintainers/teams on this new releases. Once I get enough, I will upload this version in Debian unstable (and it will migrate to Debian testing aka jessie). I will backport it for http://llvm.org/apt/ at some point. Sylvestre _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
