On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Malea, Daniel <[email protected]>wrote:
> Yeah, after thinking about this a little more, I'm not sure how nice it > will be to integrate libedit into the lldb source tree — it looks like lots > of activity is going on in libedit upstream, and it will be annoying to tie > ourselves to a single version, or to update the version we build against at > some regular interval. > > I had a chat with Sylvestre (cc'd; he's responsible for the Debian/Ubuntu > llvm-toolchain packages) and he's looking into what it would take to update > the libedit-dev version that we're all building against. If it's possible > to just update everyone's libedit packages, I think that would be a more > favourable route to a less buggy LLDB on Debian/Ubuntu :) > I don't see anyone extra cc'd? What would this "update libedit-dev" look like? We've got most folks running Ubuntu 12.04 and it'd sure be nice to be able to build with a #define set (or the like) to get a newer version of libedit that doesn't have these issues even if it isn't enabled by default on those platforms. Thanks. -Mike
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
