It doesn't revert cleanly On Feb 12, 2015 6:11 PM, "Zachary Turner" <ztur...@google.com> wrote:
> We should revert this if it's definitely the culprit. Otherwise it's > impossible for to detect another patch later which also causes a > regression. It's easy to fix and resubmit later > On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 6:03 PM Vince Harron <vhar...@google.com> wrote: > >> Hi Rafael, >> >> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-x86_64-debian-clang/builds/3326 >> >> Shows about 20 new test failures. I've narrowed it down to r228886 >> >> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?revision=228886&view=revision >> >> Can you take a look and/or give me some idea what to look for? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Vince >> >> -- >> >> Vince Harron | Technical Lead Manager | vhar...@google.com | 858-442-0868 >> _______________________________________________ >> lldb-dev mailing list >> lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev >> >
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
