IIRC I used llvm$ svn diff --revision 228885:228886 > ~/break.diff
llvm$ patch -p0 -R < ~/break.diff Some hunks failed. Could've messed something up. On Feb 12, 2015 6:20 PM, "Zachary Turner" <ztur...@google.com> wrote: > Hmm I checked the logs, that file hasn't been touched since that revision. > What's unclean about the revert? Compile failure, or other test failure? > On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 6:13 PM Vince Harron <vhar...@google.com> wrote: > >> It doesn't revert cleanly >> On Feb 12, 2015 6:11 PM, "Zachary Turner" <ztur...@google.com> wrote: >> >>> We should revert this if it's definitely the culprit. Otherwise it's >>> impossible for to detect another patch later which also causes a >>> regression. It's easy to fix and resubmit later >>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 6:03 PM Vince Harron <vhar...@google.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Rafael, >>>> >>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-x86_64-debian-clang/builds/3326 >>>> >>>> Shows about 20 new test failures. I've narrowed it down to r228886 >>>> >>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?revision=228886&view=revision >>>> >>>> Can you take a look and/or give me some idea what to look for? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Vince >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Vince Harron | Technical Lead Manager | vhar...@google.com | >>>> 858-442-0868 >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> lldb-dev mailing list >>>> lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu >>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev >>>> >>>
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
