Hmm I checked the logs, that file hasn't been touched since that revision. What's unclean about the revert? Compile failure, or other test failure? On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 6:13 PM Vince Harron <vhar...@google.com> wrote:
> It doesn't revert cleanly > On Feb 12, 2015 6:11 PM, "Zachary Turner" <ztur...@google.com> wrote: > >> We should revert this if it's definitely the culprit. Otherwise it's >> impossible for to detect another patch later which also causes a >> regression. It's easy to fix and resubmit later >> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 6:03 PM Vince Harron <vhar...@google.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Rafael, >>> >>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-x86_64-debian-clang/builds/3326 >>> >>> Shows about 20 new test failures. I've narrowed it down to r228886 >>> >>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?revision=228886&view=revision >>> >>> Can you take a look and/or give me some idea what to look for? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Vince >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Vince Harron | Technical Lead Manager | vhar...@google.com | >>> 858-442-0868 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> lldb-dev mailing list >>> lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu >>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev >>> >>
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
