On 7/19/07, Gordon Waidhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Howdy John, > > Looks good. > > One comment: I wonder if /binary/ is the right > name for llrpdef.xml and friends. It's scope seems > broader than "binary". I've pondered for a few > minutes and no better name occurs to me. I suppose > binary would be OK, but perhaps something better > is possible. > > Regards, > -gww >
I see your point since it is possible to generate the LLRP.xsd from llrpdef.xml. I don't know... archetype, model, source... base might work but then it would get confusing between "base" LLRP schema and extension LLRP schemas. -- John. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ llrp-toolkit-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/llrp-toolkit-devel
