On 7/19/07, John R. Hogerhuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We could use the word core instead of base to identify the standard > portion of LLRP. That could free up base to be used in place of > binary. > > -- John. >
offline, Gordon suggested 'encoding' instead of 'binary.' That's fine with me. Are there likely to be more encodings for LLRP? How would the naming likely work? Should the abstract be considered an "encoding?" That would add another level encoding/abstract encoding/binary abstract vs. encoding in that light seems to make more sense? either way we lose the concept of llrpdef.xml being a common source for various possible encodings. hmm... ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ llrp-toolkit-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/llrp-toolkit-devel
