On 18 January 2014 16:54, Tobias Doerffel <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to plan the next releases and also propose to change the versioning
> scheme:
>
> YY.QQ.RR
>
> YY=year
> QQ=quarter (start counting at 0)
> RR=release (start counting at 0)
>
> so if we manage to push out a release in January (which is my goal) it would
> be 14.0.0. I know this would be a confusing jump the first time but I see
> the advantage that we do not have to debate on what evolutionary step
> justifies which version jump (when do we have 0.5, when 1.0, ...???) and
> people can estimate easily how old their version is. Any opinions on this?

Yes, it seems like a nice idea even though it may be abrupt jump for
people initially but thinking of a long run it certainly seems nice. I
vote for this.

> Concerning next releases I propose to concentrate on bugfixes only for the
> stable-0.4 branch (which should be forked to master as soon as we made it)
> and finalizing our initial UI improvements. This should be done until next
> weekend.

<snip>

> Suggested roadmap for existing features branches (which IMHO are not mature
> enough for inclusion in 14.0.0):
>
> * 14.0.1: merge stable-0.4-new-fx-mixer, maybe automation recording
> * 14.0.2: merge stable-0.4-undo-redo
>
> Any comments and additions welcome!

So we have till next weekend to add new features and solve bugs if we
want to include them in the release?
I should start working then. :D


-- 
Gurjot Singh
Blog: http://bhattigurjot.wordpress.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services.
Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For
Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between.
Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
LMMS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel

Reply via email to