Why do you even want to move away from stk? It has always been working fine, I don't see any reason why we should change this.
2014-04-21 18:05 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Aquilina <[email protected]>: > You mentioned mallets using stk. What aspects of stk are used by mallets > that we cant code into our own code base to move away from requiring stk. > > > On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Vesa <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On 04/21/2014 06:59 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: >> > There can be though i guess it depends on what it needs in it etc. >> >> No, I mean if we're using libstk as a dependency, then we're using it >> as-is, there is no LMMS-specific changes in it. If it's not bundled in >> our source tree, then there can't be any customizations. >> >> >> > > > > -- > Jonathan Aquilina > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Start Your Social Network Today - Download eXo Platform > Build your Enterprise Intranet with eXo Platform Software > Java Based Open Source Intranet - Social, Extensible, Cloud Ready > Get Started Now And Turn Your Intranet Into A Collaboration Platform > http://p.sf.net/sfu/ExoPlatform > _______________________________________________ > LMMS-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start Your Social Network Today - Download eXo Platform Build your Enterprise Intranet with eXo Platform Software Java Based Open Source Intranet - Social, Extensible, Cloud Ready Get Started Now And Turn Your Intranet Into A Collaboration Platform http://p.sf.net/sfu/ExoPlatform _______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
