that's why i'm not quite happy to introduce anything
idea is in community work, involve people to do it together - maybe ask 
those who already provided their tracks.

On 22.05.2014 19:33, Tres Finocchiaro wrote:
>  It's difficult to decode what you are trying to say here but if 
> there's enough interest in merchandise we can talk about where the 
> money will go.

you got already a logo, just find some printing company and set link a 
to bandcamp (for example), i've been putting mine logo on that thread 
in, but there should be used 1 logo, that you can propose artists to add 
on their merch (if they want to), many artists don't have logo at all. - 
see how github uses it. domain name should be a part logo.

>  I don't see how any of these topics are related (except perhaps 
> promotional ideas) but if you want to make some mock-up mugs and 
> t-shirts please do.

i don't think that there's need to switch, it's just +1 more thing, 
while this can be riscy (-25).
>  I don't believe that to be necessarily true but you should probably 
> talk with the bandcamp maintainers if you feel that strongly we should 
> switch.

maybe the world doesn't need it, but maybe artist do, just like another 
one tripleoscillator-synth-thing, you can teach anyone to programm c++ 
and get on market, if you don't want to start a label  - maybe find 
some? then reverb is a first stop, bandcamp also got their Pro services, 
they do the same as labels do, you will be limited in what they will 
provide. i don't bc because jamendo for example provides more listeners 
in a day without any activity, while bandcamp do about 0.

> Uroš
> I really think that the world doesen't need another new record label. 
> Yes, the idea sounds cool, but there is really a lot more work in 
> creating a good label than you probably think. I think it would be 
> better to actually educate the LMMS users how to submit a demo to a 
> label and how to make their music more popular. If they ever have any 
> income, some will surely donate to lmms.

i think that people worked well on their  tracks and did what they can 
to support lmms.dev, but lmms.dev just don't uses it properly and it's 
no good...
if there will be more opportunitites than people can get themselves, 
then maybe it will inspire them to do something better,  i think on how 
to help them to evolve with lmms, get in team, produce, support each 
other. i think that some of them can search on what is needed for label 
and get in touch with others to do something new, that can be more 
opened and succesfull than any label can do for them, because it is 
their support and interest, not of some people who needs more income to 
buy more, but just because they like to do that.


-- 
symbiants
oe ai


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.
Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
_______________________________________________
LMMS-devel mailing list
LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel

Reply via email to