thank you for understanding. label-studio issue : i thought of working together on tracks, so they could be more polished, for contributions, if it is needed.
g.music : yes, maybe it will not be successfull, that's why it is discussed, but there's potential as big as g.users, they set about 1dollar for albm (the lowest price i saw) and maybe there's an option to make it free (not sure, still don't have it and maybe in some later time i will and i can tell stats on it), i think that you can set the price as low as you want, but i'm not sure, maybe google sets the lowest. fb.group : really i wouldn't mind, the only thing i'm affraid, that when i listen music this can affect my compositions, so people will tell about plagiary or something... i'm not listening /pete tong/armin van buuren/other dj's/ music because of that. Also i'm very criticising person, i'm affraid to upset people. i'd do that with user voting, so they could decide themselves, then after review those and put them into next album, send it to jam/bc/g/fb also there's radio stations to send it, maybe they will do it, but the thing here is how to implement lmms.artists for particular contributed song (that's why there's need on some more work, so it was a remix like - that's what i think) as for artists - that's why i propose to make this account for them, because each of them will have to pay 25 for just one or maybe 5 good tracks, that nobody will hear, because they will conquer each other and the way i propose is just move together. i've heard lmms.1 tracks, i liked dub, few ambient was good too, but it is good for me i've heard a lot of electronic, most people likes to sing and they prefer rock-bands. all public relations should be centralised - there's g + fb + bc + lmms.site groups and someone already got those keys, so the only work is just copy-paste news, that can be edited even here or through pad. song voting is implemented with LSP, i think this can be done for lmms contributions too, something better than launchpad for registered users, that already contributed something i guess - that's the community work, that they will do probably. and winners will be like promoted - that's something i was talking about. and by the way those who get more votes will be able to work on the album (or maybe group of 3-5), they will introduce album, get graphics, maybe rework some tracks to make it sound better (if author will agree), etc On 24.05.2014 03:22, Stian Jørgensrud wrote: > Hi oeai-2! > > I was one of the artists who provided a song for the album. I was also one > of those who - kind of - made the contest and album come true, but the real > credit must go to Avelocity (Uros and other artists). I am so rude that I > toss my idea behind the album out: Promote the software LMMS and what can be > created with it. In my head the album wasn't created to showcase LMMS > artists, but to showcase the program. Perhaps would Google Music better > showcase the artists, but that wasn't the goal. > > Personally I have nothing against putting the album up on Google Play Music. > On the other hand I don't think it is worth bothering. The album hasn't been > a huge success (from what I have heard/read), and it doesn't generate a lot > of money. You hint to that one would generate more money, and this I have no > reasons to believe. The LMMS world is a small world and the artists not very > famous. Some of them makes extraordinary music - in some persons opinion - > however if the songs these artists made had been ground breaking, some of > these artists surely would have been famous by now? Do you know about a > famous artist which uses LMMS? > > LMMS might seem as a professional software, perhaps it is a professional > software, still it is freeware and right now it seems it will continue to > be. This means a lot of things about the program, but also when it comes to > the world spanning around the program. Those who work for and on LMMS work > for free (except random donations). Many users have little music experience > and/or money when they begin with LMMS, thus the quality of a lot of songs > created in LMMS isn't the best. > > And now back to the idea of making a Google Music artist account. I like it! > It is only 25 dollars in total. If artists of chosen songs agrees on putting > their songs up there, both they and LMMS would get more publicity. > A bit off-topic: oeai-2, would you like to join a team which each week > decides on one song to publish/promote on the LMMS Facebook page? The team > currently consists of nobody. > > To sum it up: I am not pro nor con this suggestion. I have too little time > to think and make up my mind, actually. I do think that in the future (need > more persons/staff) it could be beneficial. What needs to be discussed is > whether the songs would be free of charge or paid on this potential account. > I agree with Uros on that it would turn into some kind of label if the > artists claimed some of the money - which we much rather would want them to > claim from a real label, and so I was picturing that all the songs should be > free. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/make-some-noise-tp8937p8957.html > Sent from the lmms-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE > Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. > Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available > Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." > http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs > _______________________________________________ > LMMS-devel mailing list > LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel > -- Symbiants oe ai ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs _______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
